A couple of my friends were chatting on Facebook the other night. The first one asked for recommendations on what books to read this summer. At the end of one of her comments, she said, â€œDonâ€™t bother to recommend romances, theyâ€™re a waste of time.â€Â When I responded, another friend said they werenâ€™t referring to the kind of romances I write, but the ones that have no plot, and are just an excuse to include one sex scene after another. (Iâ€™m paraphrasing as best I can rememberâ€¦ but bottom line, they were not being complimentary to the romance genre.)
Forgive me if I confess to being a bit offended. And forgive me again when I say, I know exactly what they mean.
Iâ€™m reading a romance novel right now thatâ€™s written by a best selling author and published by a major house.Â It has no plot to speak of.Â Basically, something bad happened, long before the book began, and the book is spent reliving the past and discussing its implications on the present and future â€“ ad nauseum. I like the characters, but all they ever do is go to work, go on dates, and make love. They sit and think about things â€“ a lot. They talk about things, but they have no real goals, no motivation. No one is trying to keep them from attaining their non-existent goals. They are surrounded by friends â€“ loving, supportive allies who want them to resolve their problems and be happy. They rehash the same old things again and again. I must care enough about the characters to find out what happens to them, because Iâ€™m still reading, but I find myself skimming over entire scenes because I am bored.Â This is not a good thing.
It irritates me that authors who have the honor of being published by major houses write such drivel. It irritates me that readers, who are obviously buying their books by the thousands, donâ€™t have higher expectations. It irritates me that their publishers donâ€™t demand more from them. But most of all, it irritates me that I am being lumped into the same category as these writers, and writers who write the literary equivalent of porn flicks, just because I write romance.
To assume that my books have no worth simply because they end happily, and include a love story, is just plain insulting. Â Reviewer Sheila Deeth called my first book, Night and Day, a thinking womanâ€™s romance. I love that phrase. I have much to learn as an author, and Night and Day is certainly not perfect, but itâ€™s also not trite, mindless, or a waste of time. Hereâ€™s what Sheila said:
â€œSome romances, you know exactly which protagonists are going to get together. You know it will be perfect. Youâ€™re just waiting for the characters to work it out for themselves. But Sherrie Hansenâ€™s Night and Day isnâ€™t that kind of romance. These characters are all too real and too flawed for a perfect world. Theyâ€™re stubborn. They cling to dreams and donâ€™t want to compromise. Their relationships struggle to pass each all-too-human hurdle, and even as the story nears its close, itâ€™s not clear which lives will stay entwined and which connections will quietly unravel. Is love just an idealized dream after all, or are dreams the stuff of love?
Sherrie Hansen creates sprawling farm and comfortable home, American countryside, Danish streets, wobbling bicycles, squabbling siblings, loversâ€™ argumentsâ€¦ Her scenery and her characters are all equally real, from Anders despising all things American, to Jensen delighting in all things historical, to practical Ed and misunderstood Tara, and parents whoâ€™ve moved away to Arizona. The love in these pages isnâ€™t syrupy sweet, the characters arenâ€™t cutouts chasing after dreams, the internetâ€™s not perfect and neither is love, or homeland. But the mysteries of a hundred-year-old romance have messages for an all-too-modern internet relationship, and the lessons of lilacs cut to make them bloom are relevant to all.
I loved following these characters as their relationships grew. I loved wondering what choices Jensen would make, and whether she and Anders could ever turn fairy-tale into reality. I loved the side characters. I loved the conversations. I loved the worldâ€¦
Sherrie Hansenâ€™s created a thinking womanâ€™s romance, as full of depth and feeling and love as any other, but seasoned with history, internet, real relationships, common sense and hope; a wonderful novel, highly recommended.â€
And one more thing, while Iâ€™m on the subject of romance. You could do worse. My husband and I just finished listening to all three books in the Hunger Games trilogy. Despair, disillusionment, detachment, and depression â€“ from beginning to end. Iâ€™m of the opinion that this world needs a few more happy endings. I believe the world needs a little more love.Â And if people find a little hope, joy, peace and love â€“ a little romance â€“ in the midst of all the negative things that pervade our world, is there anything so wrong with that? Take a chance on romance. Look for a novel by Lyn Cote, Pamela Morsi, Susan Elizabeth Phillips, Jennifer Crusie, Julie Garwood, Jill Marie Landis, LaVyrle Spencer, or Debbie Macomber, to name a few. Youâ€™ll find plenty to hold your interestâ€¦ action, adventure, worthy protagonists and antagonists, symbolism, meaning, depth.
I write novels that are commonly known as romance novels. Because romance novels have negative connotations for so many people, I chose to use the word love in the title of my blog, fearing if I used the word romance, most people wouldnâ€™t even read the article. But donâ€™t be mistaken. Iâ€™m proud to be a writer of love stories. Iâ€™m a thinking woman, and the romances I write are well worth a few hours of your time. Try one â€“ youâ€™ll be surprised at what you might learn.